If I remember correctly i bought it in the element scare,shortage inside the 90's and in no way used it.
The reason I talk to is because I've a substantial amount of H335 but I simply cannot get it to shoot as correct since the CFE223. I am load 223 for my AR. Is there any way to determine how much H335 can be equivalent to 27.three of CFE223 ?
One particular needs to be weighed For each and every spherical. An IMR powder, but provides me the very best teams. I am slowly and gradually going faraway from it to ball powders.
Posted: five/3/2016 seven:47:forty eight AM EDT [#9] I have been attempting CFE223 with some fifty five grain bullets. Continue to dealing with it. I am able to express that it seems to "feed" pretty well. I've been using my Hornady electronic powder measure/scale even though Doing the job up my loads. The CFE223 feeds so quick the powder measure cannot precisely meter it (the Digital a person). It gives me continuous about alarms. Even using the manner button to slow down the metering more than location it in "sluggish" would not function. I have not tried it while in the common powder evaluate nonetheless but hope It might be incredibly steady. I did, sort of Fortunate genuinely, operate across an extremely accurate BLC2 load a couple vary journeys back.
One particular should be weighed For each and every round. An IMR powder, but offers me the most effective teams. I'm gradually shifting faraway from it to ball powders.
Mainly because this propellant is tailor-made for precise applications, the quantity of cartridges and bullets is restricted, but in which it works, it definitely performs!
I like H335 and possess for around thirty many years. I initially applied it in a 223; continue to do. It is also handy in many other cartridges. Indeed, it does flash in some programs.
The issue is that H335 is quite properly managed as being the pressures in loads is improved, not exceeding reloading manuals maximums. But As outlined by strain test data all hell breaks out at extreme stress to The purpose that it's much more unsafe than other powders pushed over and above reloading manual maximums.
To begin with I assumed it might only be great for 223-sized cartridges. As I acquired more about this powder, I was impressed While using the wide selection of cartridges it truly is like minded for, from the small 204 Ruger up into the 375 H&H!
You can get an e mail each Friday early morning featuring the newest chatter from the most popular subjects, breaking information surrounding legislation, together with exceptional promotions only available to ARFCOM e mail subscribers.
Bottom line is more info always that for plinking ammo, I wouldn't switch unless you need to get a pair more FPS for the same charge pounds or conserve powder for the same pace (will not preserve Substantially)
Add to quote Only present this person #ten · Nov twenty five, 2014 I question very much that I've a clue of your forty many years knowledge with reloading, I'm greatly a beginner but definitely choose to reload and find out, I believe I will ease up the ladder with this particular details and keep a close eye on issues and can endeavor to Allow yea know what I come up with or how it works out, Should the rain ever stops down below,,, it has been pouring for 3 times....
As the TSX Bullet retains just about 100% of its unique bodyweight and penetrates so nicely, numerous shooters choose a lighter-excess weight TSX Bullet over a heavier typical bullet.
Quoted: I voted H335 I use lots of the things for 3gun/Level of competition/plinking ammo. Favor it under Wolf 55gr projectiles. Hornady 55gr will work excellent too. The Wolfs are a little bit far more correct while in the loads I exploit nevertheless. Light-weight loads for Competitiveness @ 22.6gr & 2.245" OAL in a number of headstamps of brass. The load is per all main headstamps for those who type them. They are light-weight loads. Be sensible and work right down to them if you are trying them.